Showing posts with label Muslims. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Muslims. Show all posts

Saturday, February 04, 2017

Transcript of the October 2014 Maher vs. Affleck Debate about Liberals and Islam



In the October 3rd, 2014 episode of Real Time, Bill Maher and his guests engaged in a heated argument about the response of American “liberals” to human rights violations in “the Muslim world.” [1] Maher, a comedian, writer, producer, and liberal political activist/commentator, is well-known for politically incorrect humor and harsh criticism of religion, including Islam. In the October 3rd episode, Maher’s guest panel included Ben Affleck, Sam Harris, Nicholas Kristof, and Michael Steele. There were furious outbursts and wild gesticulations by Affleck, hard-hitting criticisms of Islam and liberals by Maher and Harris, and accusations of racism by both Affleck and Kristof. (Steele, for his part of the discussion, was calm and diplomatic). The exchange elicited an enormous amount of controversy and was discussed across a wide spectrum of media, major and minor, for weeks thereafter. A week earlier in the September 26th episode of Real Time, Maher had also talked about American liberals and human rights violations in “the Muslim world,” and said that “vast numbers of Muslims” in their beliefs have “too much in common with ISIS.” [2]  The controversy generated in the media from Maher’s September 26th comments helped to set the stage for the October 3rd show.  

About the guests at the time of this exchange:

Affleck is an A-list Hollywood actor and director who was promoting his new movie Gone Girl.

Harris is a cognitive neuroscientist, philosopher, and critic of religion who was promoting his new book Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion.

Kristof is a journalist and columnist for the New York Times who was promoting his new book A Path Appears: Transforming Lives, Creating Opportunity.

Michael Steele is a political analyst on MSNBC and a former Chair of the Republican National Committee.


I’ve transcribed the approximately 10 minutes of the much-viewed heated exchange about liberals and Islam, from about 32:26 to 42:31 of the main portion of the show. (For audio* of the full episode, click here [3, 4]. *Update, October, 2017: The audio file is no longer available at those links). In addition, I’ve described and transcribed some other bits of the discussion that occur before and after the main exchange.

Between approximately 21:40 and 25:40, the panelists discuss what they view as the racism of some Americans, particularly those who oppose Obama on various policies. Steele says that some of it is due to racism while in other cases it is based on disagreement with the policies.

Harris is the mid-show interview guest, so he has been offstage and has not yet been a part of the panel discussion. At about 30 minutes into the episode, Maher introduces Harris, mentioning the new book he is promoting. Maher asks Harris, “You know the boys don't you?”

30:22 Harris [apparently addressing Kristof]: I know we've tangled online before.

[Kristof laughs]

Maher: Yes, and you may again here now.

That is followed by a brief joking exchange between Affleck and Harris that is, although clear in surface meaning from the audio alone, puzzling without further contextual information. Maher then starts talking about Harris’ book.

At about the 31 minute mark, Harris is talking about spirituality without religion. Maher asks him what people mean by “spiritual.”

31:53: Harris: Yeah, well, it can mean many things. Unfortunately, what many people mean by it is just as crazy as what other people believe under the context of religion. So, you know, if you're swapping your belief in the virgin birth of Jesus for a belief in Atlantis, you haven't made much intellectual progress. [audience laughter]

Affleck: [sarcastic] Come on! That's a little step down!

Harris: No, but that is in fact, if you wander the aisles of the New Age section of a bookstore, you get—

Maher: That's why the word spiritual is a little problematic.

Harris: Yes, and that’s why I’ve had to untangle it—

Maher [regarding Harris’ new book]: But it’s doing great on the charts, so people are, it’s struck a chord with people.

Harris: Yeah.

32:26 Maher: Okay. So the other thing we want to talk about of course is that you and I have been trying to make the case—I think, I have anyway—that liberals need to stand up for liberal principles. This is what I said on last week’s show. Obviously I got a lot of hate for it. But all I’m saying is that liberal principles, like freedom of speech, freedom to practice any religion you want without fear of violence, freedom to leave a religion, equality for women, equality for minorities, including homosexuals, these are liberal principles [applause] that liberals applaud for, but then when you say in the Muslim world this is what’s lacking, then they get upset.

Harris: Yeah, yeah. Well, liberals have really failed on the topic of theocracy. They’ll criticize white theocracy.

Maher: Right [laughs].

Harris: They’ll criticize Christians. They’ll still get agitated over the abortion clinic bombing that happened in 1984, but when, when you want to talk about the treatment of women, and homosexuals, and freethinkers, and public intellectuals in the Muslim world, I would argue that liberals have failed us. And the crucial point of confusion – [applause] yeah, thank you.

Affleck: Thank God you’re here!

Harris: Yeah. Well, I mean the crucial point of confusion is that we have been sold this meme of Islamophobia, where every criticism of the doctrine of Islam gets conflated with bigotry toward Muslims as people.

Maher: Right.

Harris: And that is, uh, intellectually ridiculous, and even it gets [conflated with] race.

Affleck: So hold on – are you the person who understands the officially codified doctrine of Islam? You’re the interpreter of that? So you can say well this is—

Harris: I’m actually well-educated on this topic.

Affleck: I’m, I’m asking you. So you’re saying– if I criticize that— you’re saying that Islamophobia is not a real thing. That if you are critical of something—

Maher: Well it’s not a real thing when we do it.

Affleck: Right. [audience laughter]

Maher: It really isn’t.

Harris: I’m not denying that certain people are bigoted against Muslims as people. And that’s a problem.

Affleck: That’s big of you.

Harris: But the—

Maher: But why are you so hostile about this concept?

Affleck: Because it’s gross! It’s racist! It’s disgusting!

Maher: It’s not. But it’s so not.

Affleck: It’s like saying, ‘You shifty Jew.’

Harris: Absolutely not.

Maher: You are not listening to what we are saying!

Affleck: You guys are saying if you want to be liberals, believe in liberal principles like freedom of speech,

Maher: Right, right.

Affleck: Like, um, you know, we are endowed by our Cre -- uh forefathers with [inalienable rights like] all men are created equal.

Harris: Ben, we have to be able to criticize bad ideas, and Islam—

Affleck: Of course we do! No liberal doesn`t want to criticize bad ideas.

Harris: Okay, okay, but Islam at this moment is the mother lode of bad ideas.

[applause]

Affleck: Jesus Christ!

Maher: That’s just a fact.

Harris: So we have, we have ideas like blasphemy, apostasy

Affleck: It’s not a fact. It’s an ugly thing to say!

Kristof: There’s one basic liberal principle of tolerance.

Harris: Well, let me unpack it, let me unpack it.

Maher: But not for intolerance.

Kristof: No of course not, but the picture you’re painting is to some extent true, but is hugely incomplete. It is certainly true that plenty of fanatics and jihadis are Muslim, but the people who are standing up to them, Malala, uh—

Harris: Malala is [fantastic], yes.

Kristof: —incredible Mohammad Ali Dadkhah in Iran, in prison for nine years for speaking up for Christians. A friend that I had in Pakistan who was shot this year, Rashid Rehman, for defending people accused of apostasy—

Harris: Okay, but Nick—

Kristof: —those are Muslims too.

Affleck: Or how about the more than a billion people who aren’t fanatical, who don’t punish women, who just want to go to the store, [applause] have some sandwiches, pray five times a day—

Maher: Wait a second.

Affleck: —and don’t do any of the things that you’re saying all Muslims [do]

Harris: Okay I’m not -- wait, wait, wait, wait.

Affleck: That is stereotyping.

Harris: I’m not saying all Muslims believe that.

Affleck: You are taking a few bad things and you’re painting a br—the whole religion with that same brush.

Maher: No, no. Let’s get down to who has the right answer here. A billion people, you say? All these billion people don’t hold any of those p—

Affleck: A billion five or something.

Maher: Don’t hold these pernicious beliefs? I would—

Affleck: No. They don’t.

Maher: That’s just not true, Ben. That’s just not true.

Harris: Ben, can I just express how I think it breaks down in terms of belief among Muslims?

Affleck: You haven’t even defined—

Maher: You’re trying to say that these few people, that’s all the problem is, these few bad apples. The idea that someone should be killed if they leave Mu—the Islamic—

Affleck: That’s horrible. That’s just horrible.

Harris: That is center-of-the-fairway Islam.

Maher: Wait, but wait, you’re saying that the idea that someone should be killed if they leave the Islamic religion is just a few bad apples?

Affleck: The people who would actually believe in an act that you murder somebody if they leave Islam is not the majority of Muslims at all [unclear].

Harris: Okay let me, let me break this down for you. Okay we –

Affleck: You are trafficking—

Harris: As you say we have 1.5, 1.6 billion Muslims. Now—

Affleck: Second biggest religion in the world, a quarter of the people of the population on earth.

Harris: Ben let me – let me unpack this – let me unpack this for you.

Affleck: Please do, I’ve been waiting. Luggage has been sitting there packed up.

Harris: Just imagine some concentric circles. You have at the center, you have jihadists. These are people who wake up in the morning wanting to kill apostates, wanting to die trying. They believe in paradise—

Affleck: Horrible bad people that—

Harris: They believe in martyrdom. Outside of them, we have Islamists, these are people who are just as convinced of martyrdom and paradise and wanting to, to foist their religion on the rest of humanity, but they want to work within the system. They’re not going to blow themselves up on a bus. They want to change governments. They want to use democracy against itself. That – that – those two circles arguably are 20% of the Muslim world. Okay this is not the fringe of the fringe.

Affleck: What are you basing that research on?

Harris: A bunch of poll results that we can talk about. So, to give you one point of contact, 78% of British Muslims think that the Danish cartoonists should have been prosecuted. 78%. So I’m being conservative when I roll this back to 20%. But outside of that circle you have conservative Muslims who can right—can honestly look at ISIS and say that does not represent us, that we’re horrified by that, but they hold views about human rights, and about women, and about homosexuals that are deeply troubling. So, so these are not Islamists, they’re not jihadists, but they b—

Affleck: Those are views anathema to ours.

[Crosstalk]

Harris: But they also keep women and homosexuals immiserated in these cultures, and we have to empower the true reformers in the Muslim world to change it. And what, and lying about the link between doctrine and behavior—

Affleck: [waving, gesturing for Harris finish] Okay, let him [Kristof] talk.

Harris: —is not going to do that. [applause]

Affleck: A lot of talk.

Kristof: The great divide – the great divide is not between Islam and the rest; it’s rather between the fundamentalists and the moderates in each faith.

Harris: But we’re misled to think that the fundamentalists are the fringe. Okay we have jihadists, Islamists, and conservatives.

Maher: That’s the key point. And by the way this—

Harris: Hundreds of millions of people fit that description.

Steele: Just, you’re saying that the strongest voices are coming from those who are jihadists and extremists.

Harris: That’s, yes.

Steele: That represents a bigger piece of the pie—

Harris: Yes.

Steele: —than we often think is true.

Harris: There’s no question about that.

Steele: Okay so having said that, even if that is true, statistically or otherwise, the key thing to recognize that I don’t think is part of the argument, but I think should be, is that there are voices that are oftentimes raised in opposition to these jihadists and to these extreme acts but, guess what? They don’t covered, they don’t get exposed, and they’re not given the same level of platform, um, that we see the jihadists get.

Maher: One reason they don’t get exposed is because they’re afraid to speak out because it’s the only religion that acts like the mafia, that will fucking kill you if you say the wrong thing, draw the wrong picture, or write the wrong book!

[applause]

Steele: That's true...I mean that's...So you do have—

Maher: There’s a reason why Ayaan Hirsi Ali needs bodyguards 24/7.

Steele: You do have that element of fear as well, but you also have other braver souls out there who do speak out and who like—

Kristof: Who are risking their lives to do that.

Steele: Who are risking their lives, like the Muslim clerics, and others, from Australia to Europe, to the United States, just recently, publicly put their names on paper declare – declaring their opposition to what ISIS and others are doing.

Harris: Yeah, we need to do that.

Steele: So there are those voices, but where was the coverage? Where was, where was that story to sort of create a different picture, of the Muslim community?

Affleck: What is your solution? Like what is your ‘ask’? To just condemn Islam? Is that the question?

Harris: No, the solution is very much what Nick—

Affleck: We’ve killed more Muslims than they’ve killed us by an awful lot. We’ve invaded more [of their countries] than they have of ours by an awful lot.

Maher: I am not for more killing.

Affleck: And yet somehow we’re exempt from these things because they’re not really a reflection of what we believe in. We did it by accident, that’s why we invaded Iraq, and put 4 million people—[applause]

Harris: You are, you are free associating.

Maher: We’re not convincing anybody.

[audience laughter]

Affleck: It’s not [free associating]. I am specifically telling you that I disagree with what you think.

Harris: You don’t actually understand my argument.

Maher: I know, and we’re obviously not convincing anybody [unclear].

Affleck: I don’t understand it?

[audience laughter]

Harris: You don’t understand my argument.

Affleck: Your argument is, like, ‘You know, black people, you know they shoot each other.’

Harris: That is not my argument

Maher: No it’s not! No it’s not! It’s based on facts. I can show you a Pew poll of Egyptians—they are not outliers in the Muslim world—that say like 90% of them believe death is the appropriate response to leaving the religion. If 90% of Brazilians thought that death was the appropriate response to leaving Catholicism you would think it was a bigger deal.

Affleck: I would think it’s a big deal no matter what.

Harris: Apparently you don’t.

Maher: Okay, but that’s the facts.

Affleck: But what I wouldn’t do is say it’s all Brazilians, or I wouldn’t say,

Harris: When have I said it’s all Brazilians?

Affleck: ‘Well, Ted Bundy did this. God damn these gays, they’re all trying to eat each other!’

Harris: Okay, let me just give you what you want. There are hundreds of millions of Muslims who are nominal Muslims, who don’t take the faith seriously, who don’t want to kill apostates, who are horrified by ISIS, and we need to defend these people, prop them up, and let them reform their faith.

Affleck: Could you talk — ISIS couldn’t fill a double-A ballpark in Charleston, West Virginia, and you’re making a career out of talking about ISIS, ISIS, ISIS.

Maher: No, no, no we’re not! That’s the opp—

Harris: No, it’s not just ISIS, it’s all jihadists. It’s global, it’s a phenomenon of global jihad.

Maher: I think that’s the opposite of what we’re doing.

Affleck: There is those things. There is ISIS, there is global jihadists. The question is the degree to which you’re willing to say, because I’ve witnessed this behavior—which we all object to on the part of these people—I’m willing to flatly condemn those of you I don’t know and have never met.

Maher: Not, not willing. This is based on re—

Harris: No. It’s not condemning people, it’s ideas. You’ve got to make the distinction.

Maher: And people who believe in those ideas.

Harris: Yes, and their behavior [unclear]—

Affleck: So it’s [unclear] people believe—

Maher: Based on reality, Ben!

Harris: It’s based on actions.

Maher: We’re not making it up, that there is, that in the Muslim world, it is mainstream belief, main—

Kristof: But this is such a caricature of Indonesia, of Malaysia—

[applause]

Harris: Okay wait a minute.

Kristof: —and of so much of the world. And this does have the tinge a little bit of the way white racists talk about African-Americans, and define blacks by black criminals, which are not representative.

Maher: But what you’re saying is because they are a minority, we shouldn’t make – we shouldn’t – we shouldn’t criticize.

Affleck: It’s not that much of a minority. It’s the second biggest religion in the world.

Maher: Exactly, but you’re treating them like a minority. I mean, if Filipinos were capturing teenagers and sending them into white slavery, we would criticize that. We wouldn’t say, ‘Well, they’re Filipinos.’

Affleck: You would criticize the people who are doing it, not the Philippines! You know what I mean, we—

Maher: What if the people were—

Affleck: [Because] a Filipino kid [who] lives down the street from you would have nothing to do with that. So these are different things. Crazy people—

Kristof: Racial stereotyping.

Steele: I think, I think it goes—

Maher: Alright, let’s, let’s talk, we mentioned ISIS. Let’s talk about that, because 52% of Americans in a poll I saw out today said they are now willing to send ground troops, which is an amazing turnaround. Turkey got involved this week […]

[Maher talks about countries that surround Syria, such as Turkey, getting involved in fighting militarily against ISIS. The panel then discusses whether the U.S. should send in ground troops or whether the countries in the region should solve it.]

44:18 Affleck: And yes, Turkey needs to step up. And it’s a lovely Muslim country, if you’ve ever been there. I suggest you visit. It’s one of the most beautiful Muslim countries in the world, where I’ve had a great time. […]

[Affleck is against U.S. intervention, but Steele argues that there are times when the U.S. needs to step in if others aren't.]

46:31 Steele: […] If the people in the region aren’t prepared to draw the line [to stop ISIS], then the question is who? Is it the Brits? Is it the French? Is it the Americans? [crosstalk] And that’s the global community’s question.

Harris: The question is who is “us”. “Us” is humanity. What you're [addressing Affleck] saying does not work out well for the Yazidis being starved on the side of a mountain. So, if you're going to say that we can't get our hands dirty because it is so inflammatory to have infidels encroach into the space—which is in fact the reality, this is why we can't do this, we can't be the world's cop because the moment—

Affleck: What's stopped us for the last 14 years?

Harris: No, we can't do it well, it doesn't have the effect that we want because this is anathema. We have infidel boots on the ground next to the holy sites in Mecca.

Affleck: I agree that was Osama's biggest problem

Harris: That only speaks to the problem of religious divisiveness. The reality is, we've got a genocide underway and we can't figure out how to stop it and the regional powers won't. If you're just willing to wash your hands and say well, ‘don't even drop a bomb to save these people,’ I think that's starkly unethical

Kristof: The air strikes did stop the slaughter of the Yazidis

Harris: But many liberals came out against that [crosstalk] before the first bomb fell.

[The panel then talks a bit more about the problems of intervention, and Maher switches over to another segment of the show.]


References

[1] Clip from Episode 331 HBO Real Time with Bill Maher, originally October 3, 2014.

[2] Clip from Episode 330 HBO Real Time with Bill Maher, originally September 26, 2014.

[3] Full Episode 331 Audio Only
http://omnyapp.com/shows/real-time-with-bill-maher/episode-331-originally-aired-10-3-2014
[Update, April 5, 2017: The audio file is no longer available at omnyapp]

[4] Alternative Link for Full Episode 331 Audio Only
[Update, October 31, 2017: The audio file is no longer available at podcasts.com]


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Monday, August 08, 2016

Comparing Levels of Extremism in Muslim and Christian Populations in Pew’s (2009) Sub-Saharan Survey Data


In recent articles, using single-question and multi-question set analyses of Pew’s survey data, I examined the percentages of Muslim adults who hold views or endorse practices that are hardline fundamentalist or extremist. Continuing that research here, I compare Christians and Muslims. I will also examine whether Muslims who favor Islamic law are more or less hardline/extremist than Christians who favor the Bible as the law. These analyses, like the previous ones, make use of freely-available statistical software (e.g., PSPP), common spreadsheets, and publicly-available microdata.[3] I gave some basic instructions for using PSPP to analyze Pew datasets in previous articles (here, here, and here). The results reported here are publicly verifiable for readers who have adequate knowledge and skill.

The Pew Forum’s “Tolerance and Tension” survey [1] of sub-Saharan Africa, conducted between December of 2008 and April of 2009, was fielded in 19 countries and represented about 75% of the population in the sub-Saharan region.[2]  As mentioned in Pew’s (2010) report, sub-Saharan Africa is “among the most religious places in the world,” where the vast majority of respondents say that religion is “very important in their lives” (p. 3, Complete Report pdf). The survey’s data [3] are for the most part adequate for comparing the views of Christians and Muslims. (The “Tolerance and Tension” (2010) Complete Report pdf is cited throughout this article. Readers may find it helpful to have that pdf open and available).

Results for Christians and Muslims will be compared on questions concerning severe punishments such as whippings and cutting off of hands for crimes like theft, stoning of people who commit adultery, use of arms and violence against civilians to defend religion, making sharia (Islamic law) or the Bible the official law of the land, whether women should be allowed in religious leadership positions, and whether or not one has had one’s daughter(s) “circumcised.” A comparison regarding the death penalty for apostasy is not possible because the question was only asked of Muslims.

Pew’s weight variable was applied to obtain the response choice percentages for each question or set of questions in each country. The overall response choice percentages for each question or set reported here are weighted according to the sizes of the adult (age 18 and older) populations of Muslims and Christians, respectively, per country. For subsets, including the subsets who favor religious law, or who have daughter(s), or both, response choice percentages are weighted according to the estimated population size of the subset per country, per religious group. I made the population estimates shown in Table 1, below, for Muslim and Christian adults using the method described in Appendix A of a previous article, based on Pew’s religion-specific age structure estimates for each country for 2010.[4]


Table 1


Sample and Estimated Population Sizes of Muslim and Christian Adults in Pew’s (2009) Survey of
Sub-Saharan Africa

Sample
Population
Muslims
8287
82808400
Subset in Favor of Sharia as the Law
5142
52240936



Christians
15324
210540000
Subset in Favor of Bible as the Law
9002
126421065
Notes. Samples and population estimates are of Christians and Muslims age 18 or older.
Sample sizes displayed here are of raw counts (unweighted numbers).


Christian samples and populations exclude Djibouti, Mali, and Senegal because not enough Christians were sampled in those countries (ns ≤ 103; see the Complete Report pdf, pp. 17, 66). Muslim samples and populations exclude Botswana, Rwanda, South Africa, and Zambia because not enough Muslims were sampled in those countries (ns < 100; see the Complete Report, pp. 17, 66). There remain 16 countries for the Christian sample, 15 for the Muslim sample, and 12 where adequate samples were available for both.

Appropriate margins of error for the samples shown in Table 1, above, and Table 9, below, cannot be calculated based on Pew’s published information. However, the samples analyzed in this article are large enough that margin of error is not a major concern for the comparisons. For more on this topic, and some links to online calculators that can be used to get a rough estimate of the margins of error, see Appendix C in my previous article. According to those online calculators, the margins of error for the smallest sample (2968) in Table 9 would be ± 1.8% and for the largest sample (15324) in Table 1 would be ± 0.8%, assuming 95% confidence and a response choice proportion of .5.



Analyses

Summaries

Table 2: Summary Results for Single-Question Analyses

Population-Weighted Percentages of Muslims and Christians in Sub-Saharan Countries Who Favored, Justified, or Affirmed Extremist Items
Item Favored, Justified, or Affirmed
Muslims
Christians
General
Relig. Law
General
Relig. Law
Sample
Subset
Sample
Subset
Whippings and cutting off hands
44
56
16
18
Stoning of adulterers
38
49
12
14
Using arms, violence to defend religion*
22
25
15
16
Only men should be religious leaders
72
76
41
40
Had daughter(s) “circumcised”**
19
19
12
13
Religious law as official law of the land
63

60

Notes. Displayed numbers are rounded. See text for details about the population-weighting of percentages.
Dataset: Pew Sub-Saharan Africa Survey 2009.
*Often or sometimes justified = “justified”.
**Includes only respondents who had one or more daughters.
Item wording in this table is simplified. See text and original Pew source for exact and complete wording.


The pattern of results in Table 2 indicates that overall, compared to Muslims, Christians are much less supportive of the harsh punishments, less supportive of violence against civilians to defend religion, more supportive of allowing women (not only men) to be religious leaders, somewhat less likely to have had their daughter(s) “circumcised,” but almost as likely to have favored religious law as the law of the land. Christians who favor making the Bible the official law of the land do not appear to differ much from the general sample of Christians in their support for these items. Compared to Muslims in general, Muslims in favor of making sharia or Islamic law the official law of the land show clearly higher support for the harsh punishments, slightly higher support for using violence against civilians to defend religion and for having only men as religious leaders, but do not appear more likely to have had their daughter(s) “circumcised.”


Table 3: Summary Results for Multi-Question Set Analyses

Population-Weighted Percentages of Muslims and Christians in Sub-Saharan Countries Who Favored at Least One, at Least Two, or Opposed All Extremist Items Per Question Set
Two-, Three-, and Four-Question Sets
Muslims
Christians
Favor at Least
Oppose
Favor at Least
Oppose
One
Two
All
One
Two
All
Whippings/cutting, Stoning adulterers
49
33
49
20
8
77
Whippings/cutting; Stoning adulterers; Using violence to defend religion
58
37
30
30
10
51
Whip/cut; Stoning; Violence to defend religion; Only men as religious leaders
88
51
7
59
18
27
Notes. Displayed numbers are rounded. See text for details about the population-weighting of percentages.
Dataset: Pew Sub-Saharan Africa Survey 2009.
Item wording in this table is simplified. See text and original Pew source for exact and complete wording.

The vast majority of Muslims (88%) supports at least one and a slight majority (51%) supports at least two of the set of four extremist items. Among Christians, a majority (59%) supports at least one while a minority (18%) supports at least two of the four extremist items. Comparing the “Favor at least one” results for the three-item set with those for the four-item set, it appears that the additional roughly 30% support among both Muslims and Christians for extremism consists of those who favor only men as religious leaders.



Single-Item Comparisons of the Levels of Extremism/Fundamentalism Among Christians Versus Muslims, and General Samples Versus Religious Law-Favoring Subsets

Making Religious Law the Official Law of the Country

Q94a (p. 285), Q95a (p. 289)

Asked of Christians: Q94 “And do you favor or oppose the following? … a. making the Bible the official law of the land in our country”

Asked of Muslims: Q95 “And do you favor or oppose the following? … a. making sharia, or Islamic law, the official law of the land in our country”

Pew’s response code: 1 = favor, 2 = oppose, 8 = don’t know, 9 = refused.

Table 4

Q95a (Muslims) “…making sharia, or Islamic law, the official law of the land in our country”

Q94a (Christians) “…making the Bible the official law of the land in our country”


Population-Weighted Percentages

Favor
Oppose
Don’t Know
Refused
Muslims
63
34
2
1
Christians
60
35
4
1
Notes. Displayed numbers are rounded. See text for details about the population-weighting of percentages.
Dataset: Pew Sub-Saharan Africa Survey 2009.


The majority in both groups favors religious law. These majorities are not extremely large and are close to the same size. (They are also consistent with Pew’s median percentages taken across countries, see page 11, Complete Report pdf).

What does each group think is included in religious law? The subsequent analyses will shed some light on this issue.



Punishments Like Whippings and Cutting Off of Hands for Crimes Like Theft and Robbery

Complete Report pdf, Q94c (p. 287), Q95d (p. 292).

Asked of Christians: Q94 “And do you favor or oppose the following? … c. punishments like whippings and cutting off of hands for crimes like theft and robbery”

Q95d, asked of Muslims, is the same as Q94c.

Pew’s response code: 1 = favor, 2 = oppose, 8 = don’t know, 9 = refused.

Table 5

Q94c/Q95d “…punishments like whippings and cutting off of hands for crimes like theft and robbery”

Population-Weighted Percentages

Favor
Oppose
Don’t Know
Refused
General Sample




Muslims
44
54
1
1
Christians
16
81
2
1

Subset in Favor




of Religious Law




Muslims
56
42
1
0
Christians
18
80
2
0
Notes. Displayed numbers are rounded. See text for details about the population-weighting of percentages.
Dataset: Pew Sub-Saharan Africa Survey 2009.

The vast majority of Christians opposes these severe punishments. Favoring Biblical law does not make much of a difference. In contrast, a large minority (44%) of Muslims favors these punishments, as does the majority (56%) of the sharia-favoring subset. Clearly, Muslims and Christians differ greatly from each other in their understandings of religious or religiously-based law in regards to these severe punishments. Of course, even the 16% support among Christians for these extremely violent punishments is large enough to be concerning.



Stoning of Adulterers

Complete Report pdf, Q94d (p. 288), Q95e (p. 293).

Asked of Christians: Q94 “And do you favor or oppose the following? … d. stoning people who commit adultery”

Q95e, asked of Muslims, is the same as Q94d.

Pew’s response code: 1 = favor, 2 = oppose, 8 = don’t know, 9 = refused.

Table 6

Q94d/Q95e “…stoning people who commit adultery”

Population-Weighted Percentages

Favor
Oppose
Don’t Know
Refused
General Sample




Muslims
38
59
2
1
Christians
12
85
2
1

Subset in Favor




Of Religious Law




Muslims
49
48
2
1
Christians
14
84
2
0
Notes. Displayed numbers are rounded. See text for details about the population-weighting of percentages.
Dataset: Pew Sub-Saharan Africa Survey 2009.

Thus far, the population-weighted results in Tables 5 and 6 are consistent with what Pew indicated (Complete Report pdf, p. 49), i.e., that support for severe punishments overall is higher among Muslims than among Christians. Here the plurality (49%) of sharia-favoring Muslims and a large minority (38%) of the general sample favor stoning people who commit adultery. Only a relatively small minority of Christians overall (12%) favored the punishment and it was not much bigger (14%) in the Biblical law-favoring subset.



Using Arms and Violence Against Civilians to Defend One’s Religion

Complete Report pdf, Q88 (p. 279)

Q 88. “Some people think that the tactic of using arms and violence against civilians in defense of their religion is justified. Other people believe that, no matter what the reason, this kind of violence is never justified. How about you? Do you personally feel that the tactic of using arms and violence against civilians in defense of your religion can be often justified, sometimes justified, rarely justified, or never justified?”

Pew’s response code: 1 = Often justified, 2 = Sometimes justified, 3 = Rarely justified, 4 = Never justified, 8 = Don’t know, 9 = Refused. 

My classification: 1 or 2 = extremist, 4 = moderate. I deemed “rarely” as not moderate, but also as not sufficiently extremist for the analyses in the present article.

Comment: There are some problems with this question. Briefly, “civilians” is not well-defined, “religion” could be understood as a doctrine or as a group of adherents, “defense” is too broad, and “arms and violence” could range from a limited beating that does not produce serious injury to a use of weapons of mass destruction that kills thousands of people.

Table 7

Q88. “… Do you personally feel that the tactic of using arms and violence against civilians in defense of your religion can be often justified, sometimes justified, rarely justified, or never justified?”

Population-Weighted Percentages

Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Don’t Know
Refused
General Sample






Muslims
7
15
17
54
6
1
Christians
5
10
14
64
6
1

Subset in Favor






Of Religious Law






Muslims
9
16
18
51
6
1
Christians
5
11
15
63
6
0
Notes. Displayed numbers are rounded. See text for details about the population-weighting of percentages.
Dataset: Pew Sub-Saharan Africa Survey 2009.

However respondents may have construed the various components of the question, 22% of Muslims indicated that such violence was often or sometimes justified, compared to 15% of Christians.* More Christians said such violence was never justified (64%) as compared to Muslims (54%). There was little difference between the general samples and their respective religious law-supporting subsets.

*Compare with Pew’s median percentages taken across countries, p. 47, Complete Report pdf.



Women Allowed Versus Only Men in Religious Leadership Positions

Complete Report pdf, Q59c (p. 195).

Q59 “Now I’m going to read you two statements. Please tell me whether the FIRST statement or the SECOND statement comes closer to your own views — even if neither is exactly right. …c. 

1 - Women should be allowed to serve in religious leadership roles, such as pastor, priest or imam

OR

2 - Only men should be able to serve in religious leadership roles, such as pastor, priest or imam

…”

Pew’s response coding (with my paraphrasing): 1 = women allowed, 2 = only men, 3 = “Neither/Both equally,” 8 = don’t know, 9 = refused

My classification: 1 = moderate view, 2 = extremist view.

Table 8

Q59c. Response choices:

“Women should be allowed to serve in religious leadership roles…”
vs.
“Only men should be able to serve in religious leadership roles…”


Population-Weighted Percentages

Women Allowed
Only Men
Neither/Both
Don’t Know
Refused
General Sample





Muslims
22
72
3
2
0
Christians
52
41
5
2
0

Subset in Favor





of Religious Law





Muslims
19
76
3
2
0
Christians
53
40
5
1
0
Notes. Displayed numbers are rounded. See text for details about the population-weighting of percentages.
Dataset: Pew Sub-Saharan Africa Survey 2009.

The results for this question on the status of women show a large difference between Christians and Muslims (also see p. 55, Complete Report pdf). A substantial majority of Muslims (72%) and a large minority of Christians (41%) prefer that only men should serve, rather than to (also) allow women, in religious leadership roles. However, a slight majority (52%) of Christians prefer to (also) allow women, not only men, as religious leaders, while only 22% of Muslims make that preference. There was little difference between Christians generally and the Biblical law-favoring subset. The sharia-favoring subset showed a slightly greater preference for having only men in these roles compared to Muslims generally.



Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)

Complete Report pdf, Q71 (p. 231) Q72d (pp. 54, 235). 

Q71: “Do you have any daughters?”

Pew’s Q71 response code: 1 = Yes, 2 = No, 8 = Don’t know, 9 = Refused.

Table 9

Sample and Estimated Population Sizes of the Subsets of Christians and Muslims Who Have At Least One Daughter

Sample
Population
Muslims With Daughter(s)
4695
46912713
Subset in Favor of Sharia as the Law
2968
30297416



Christians With Daughter(s)
7613
106116787
Subset in Favor of Bible as the Law
4538
64507539
Notes. Samples and population estimates are of Christians and Muslims age 18 or older.
Sample sizes displayed here are of raw counts (unweighted numbers).

The subset of respondents who answered “Yes” to Q71 were asked (Q72) “And thinking about your child or children, please tell me if you ever do or ever did any of the following things with them. Did you or do you (d). have any of your daughters circumcised?”

Pew’s Q72d response code: 1 = Yes, 2 = No, 3 = Not applicable/Children too young (volunteered), 8 = Don’t know, 9 = Refused.

Table 10

Q72. “Did you … d. have any of your daughters circumcised?”

Population-Weighted Percentages

Yes
No
N/A /too young
Don’t Know
Refused
With Daughter(s)





Muslims
19
77
1
0
2
Christians
12
82
4
1
2






Subset in Favor





of Religious Law*





Muslims
19
77
1
1
2
Christians
13
82
3
1
1
Notes. Displayed numbers are rounded. See text for details about the population-weighting of percentages.
Dataset: Pew Sub-Saharan Africa Survey 2009.
*Respondents in this subset have daughter(s) (Q71 = 1) and favor religious law (Q94a = 1) or (Q95a = 1).

Among those with daughter(s), 19% of Muslims and 12% of Christians said they’d had their daughter(s) “circumcised”. There were practically no differences between the general sample and the subset who favored making their religious law the official law of their country. As a point of comparison to the population-weighted results for the general samples with daughter(s), unweighted means of 25% of Muslims (in their 15-country sample) and 11% of Christians (in their 16-country sample) reportedly had their daughter(s) “circumcised.”

Pew did not ask whether the respondent currently approves of FGM. In the region, attitudes toward FGM have been changing. Saying that one has had the practice done to one’s daughters at some point, perhaps many years prior to the survey, doesn’t necessarily mean that one still accepted the practice at the time of the survey. In addition, those who do not have daughters were not asked the question but may approve of the practice, and may have it done at some point in the future when they do have daughters.

Note that these percentages differ somewhat from those reported by UNICEF due at least in part to the different methods.



Multi-Question Comparisons of the Levels of Extremism/Fundamentalism Among Christians Versus Muslims

Two-Question Set: Q94c/Q95d Whippings and cutting off of hands for crimes like theft and robbery, Q94d/Q95e Stoning of people who commit adultery.

Table 11

Two-question set: Q94c/Q95d whippings and cutting off hands, Q94d/Q95e stoning of adulterers.

Population-Weighted Percentages

Number of Extremist Items Favored
Opposed
Both
Remainder

Zero
One
Two
Muslims
51
16
33
49
2
Christians
80
12
8
77
4
Notes. Displayed numbers are rounded. See text for details about the population-weighting of percentages.
Dataset: Pew Sub-Saharan Africa Survey 2009.

Forty-nine percent (49%) of Muslims versus 20% of Christians favored at least one of these two severe punishments. Thirty-three percent (33%) of Muslims but only 8% of Christians favored both. The Remainder = Favored Zero – Opposed Both.



Three-Question Set: Q94c/Q95d Whippings and cutting off of hands for crimes like theft and robbery, Q94d/Q95e Stoning of people who commit adultery, Q88 Using arms and violence against civilians to defend your religion.

Table 12

Three-question set: Q94c/Q95d whippings and cutting off hands, Q94d/Q95e stoning of adulterers, Q88 using arms and violence to defend religion.

Population-Weighted Percentages

Number of Extremist Items Endorsed
Opposed
All
Remainder

Zero
One
Two
Three
Muslims
42
21
27
10
30
12
Christians
70
20
8
2
51
18
Notes. Displayed numbers are rounded. See text for details about the population-weighting of percentages.
Dataset: Pew Sub-Saharan Africa Survey 2009.

Fifty-eight percent (58%) of Muslims endorsed at least one and 37% endorsed at least two, while 30% of Christians endorsed at least one and 10% endorsed at least two out of the three extremist items. The Remainder = Favored Zero – Opposed All.



Four-Question Set: Q94c/Q95d Whippings and cutting off of hands for crimes like theft and robbery, Q94d/Q95e Stoning of people who commit adultery, Q88 Using arms and violence against civilians to defend your religion, Q59c Whether women should be allowed to be religious leaders.

Table 13

Four-question set: Q94c/Q95d whippings and cutting off hands, Q94d/Q95e stoning of adulterers, Q88 using arms and violence to defend religion, Q59c whether women should be allowed to be religious leaders.

Population-Weighted Percentages

Number of Extremist Items Endorsed
Opposed
All
Rmdr.

Zero
One
Two
Three
Four
Muslims
12
36
21
23
7
7
5
Christians
41
41
13
5
1
27
14
Notes. Displayed numbers are rounded. See text for details about the population-weighting of percentages.
Dataset: Pew Sub-Saharan Africa Survey 2009.

A population-weighted 88% of Muslims endorsed at least one, 51% endorsed at least two, and 30% endorsed at least three out of the four extremist items. Among Christians, a population-weighted 59% endorsed at least one, 18% endorsed at least two, and 5% endorsed at least three out of the four extremist items. The Remainder = Favored Zero – Opposed All.

The population-weighted mean extremism score (range: 0 – 4) for Muslims = 1.77 and for Christians = .84. (Pew made a partly similar measure which they called a religious jurisprudence index).[5]

Looking across Table 13, we can see that as the number of extremist items in the set increases, the relatively more extremist group (Muslims), in greater percentages, supports higher numbers of items as compared to the less extremist group (Christians). A similar pattern for more extremist versus less extremist countries was shown in a 7-item set in Table 11.1 of the previous article.





Summary

The single-question analyses show that, overall, among adults across numerous sub-Saharan countries, Muslims’ support for hardline fundamentalist/ extremist items was higher than that of Christians. (Differences ranged from about 7% to 31%). Compared to the general sample of Muslims, those who supported sharia as the official law of the land were more likely to support the severe punishments, but were only slightly more likely to justify militant violence against civilians to defend religion, slightly more likely to deny women equal status in the area of religious leadership, and no more likely to have had their daughter(s) “circumcised.” Compared to the general sample of Christians, those favoring the Bible as the official law of the land were not substantially more likely to support or affirm the hardline fundamentalist or extremist items assessed here. 

Multi-question set analyses of these same data showed that, compared to Christians, Muslims favored more extremist/fundamentalist items and were less likely to oppose all of them. As the number of extremist items per set increased, the difference between Muslims and Christians in levels of extremism/fundamentalism became more apparent. These results highlight the usefulness of multi-question set analyses for comparing religious groups according to the same measure of extremism/fundamentalism.




Disclaimer

Pew Research is not responsible for my analyses or my interpretation of their data. From the Pew instructions for downloading data sets: “All manuscripts, articles, books, and other papers and publications using our data should reference the Pew Research Center’s Religion & Public Life Project as the source of the data and should acknowledge that the Pew Research Center bears no responsibility for the interpretations presented or conclusions reached based on analysis of the data.”



Notes and References

[1] Tolerance and Tension: Islam and Christianity in Sub-Saharan Africa, Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life (April, 2010), Complete Report pdf. http://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2010/04/sub-saharan-africa-full-report.pdf

[2] “Tolerance and Tension,” Preface, p. ii, Complete report pdf.

[3] The data set analyzed here is the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life’s Sub-Saharan Africa Survey. The survey was fielded in 2008-2009. The data set package contains files in addition to the data file, including a Codebook and detailed Questionnaire.

[4] Pew’s religion-specific age structure estimates for 2010 can be obtained through the following interactive website: http://globalreligiousfutures.org/countries. A detailed report for these estimates is in The Global Religious Landscape: A Report on the Size and Distribution of Major Religious Groups as of 2010, The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life (December, 2012) http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2014/01/global-religion-full.pdf

[5] On pages 50-51 of the Complete Report pdf, Pew describes a partly similar score which they called a “religious jurisprudence” index. It had a 4-point scale based on responses to four items, namely, support for (i) religious law (Biblical or sharia) as the law of the land, (ii) whippings and cutting off hands, (iii) stoning adulterers, and (iv) “allowing leaders and judges to use their religious beliefs when they decide family or property disputes” (Christians, Q94b, p. 286) or “giving Muslim leaders and religious judges the power to decide family or property disputes” (Muslims, Q95b, p. 290). Pew reported a median of 12% across 16 countries for Christians supporting 3 or 4 of those items, and a median of 40% across 15 countries for Muslims supporting 3 or 4 of those items.

As the analyses in the present article showed, however, support for using the Bible as the law of the land was not an indicator of support for the two specific punishments. It is not clear how well support for the Bible as the law indicates support for real examples of religious jurisprudence. It also does not seem to be much of an indicator of extremism or hardline fundamentalism, at least as assessed here with this set of items.