The Pew Research Center survey report most often cited in this controversy is titled The World’s Muslims: Religion, Politics, and Society (April 30, 2013). In the Complete Report (April 30, 2013) and in the Topline Questionnaire, in a table on page 219 are shown the percentages of Muslims in each country listed, with each kind of response to Q92b, “Do you favor or oppose the following: the death penalty for people who leave the Muslim religion.” The table on p. 219 shows that 88% of Egyptian Muslims favored the death penalty for apostasy, 10% opposed it, and 1% didn't know or else refused to answer. The table shows a wide range in support for the punishment, from about 1% in Kazakhstan to 88% in Egypt, with support in most countries below 50%. (I've plotted those percentages here). Note: I will be referring to the Complete Report throughout this article, so readers should keep it available for viewing.
Pew also published a brief article by Sahgal and Grim (July 2, 2013), highlighting some of the extreme restrictions on religion in Egypt. They wrote (parentheses are theirs): “Egyptian Muslims also back criminalizing apostasy, or leaving Islam for another religion. An overwhelming majority of Egyptian Muslims (88%), say converting away from Islam should be punishable by death.” A Pew study in 2010 found that 84% of Egyptian Muslims supported death for apostasy.
To provide verification that the data summaries on p. 219 are of the general samples of Muslims, I contacted the primary researcher of this (2013) study, who confirmed that 88% of Egyptian Muslims favored the death penalty for apostasy, and that the apostasy question was asked of all Muslims surveyed in the countries on p. 219. (Some contact information was removed at Dr. Bell's request).
Pew made available to the public (June 4, 2014) the Data Set from which the percentages shown in the 2013 Complete Report were produced. Using freely-available statistical software, I've produced tables that will help clarify some issues about the numbers. In Table 3a, below, I show a cross-tabulation summarizing the percentages of the total, of Q79a (rows) by Q92b (columns) for Egyptian Muslims. (Following Pew's instructions, I added the weight variable in the calculations). Q79a asked respondents whether they favored or opposed making sharia law the official law of the land in their country (see pp. 46 and 201, Complete Report). 74% supported sharia, and 86% of those who supported sharia favored the death penalty for apostasy (p. 55, Complete Report). Readers can compare the totals of the rows and columns in Table 3a with the rounded numbers for Egypt on pages 201 and 219, respectively, of the Complete Report to find that they do match up. Note that the “don't know” and “refused” responses are merged in Pew's report, but are separate in Pew's data file.
In Egypt, less than 1% (.86%) overall opposed both official sharia and death for apostasy, while about 64% (63.80%) of Egyptian Muslims overall favored both. Note that the percentage for that latter response combination should not be confused with the percentage of Egyptian Muslims overall who favored the death penalty for apostasy (88.46%). Unfortunately, that confusion was made in a widely-cited secondary source.
A Major Source of the
Error
That influential secondary source was
a Washington Post article by Max Fisher (May 1, 2013) originally
titled “64 percent of Muslims in Egypt and Pakistan support the
death penalty for leaving Islam.”
In the original
uncorrected version (May 1, 2013), Fisher wrote:
“Although Pew
[April 30, 2013] does not
provide direct statistics for the share of Muslim respondents who
support executing Muslims who convert to another religion, it does
indicate the share of Muslims who support sharia and the share of
these pro-sharia Muslims who back this policy. I've used this to
extrapolate the data charted at the top of this page...”
By his own account, he acted on the
beliefs that Pew didn't provide the statistics for the overall
samples, and that he could extrapolate them from the limited
information that he did have. Apparently, he overlooked or didn't read adequately the report
materials,
available from the opening
page, which do provide the statistics for the overall
samples. For each country that he included in his calculations, he
apparently multiplied the proportion supporting sharia (e.g., for
Egypt, .74) by the proportion of sharia-supporters favoring death for
apostasy (.86 for Egypt) to get what he described as the percentage
of Muslims who supported the death penalty for apostasy (for Egypt,
about 64%, or 63.64% based on multiplying the rounded numbers). As can be seen from the cross-tabulation of the data for
Egypt in Table 3a, he obtained (a rough estimate of) the percentage
of Egyptian Muslims who favored both official sharia and death for
apostasy, not the overall percentage who favored death for apostasy.
Fisher presented his numbers for most of the countries in a red bar plot erroneously titled “Share of Muslims who support the death penalty for leaving Islam.” In the text of the original article, he referred to his numbers as “Pew's data”:
“According to
Pew's data, 78 percent of Afghan Muslims say they support laws
condemning to death anyone who gives up Islam. In both Egypt and
Pakistan, 64 percent report holding this view. This is also the
majority view among Muslims in Malaysia, Jordan and the Palestinian
territories.”
On p. 219 of Pew's (2013) Complete Report, the table shows that 79% of Muslims in
Afghanistan and 75% of Muslims in Pakistan favored death for
apostasy.
On October 15
(2014), I emailed the Washington Post, notifying them of the
erroneous apostasy numbers in Fisher's May 1, 2013 article (and in
another
article by him, dated May 2, 2013), providing them with a
link to the Complete Report, and citing page 219. On about October 28
or 29, they made a partial
correction to Fisher's May 1, 2013 article, changing the
title and stating in the text that 88% of Egyptian Muslims favored
the death penalty for apostasy. However, the corrected article
contained other errors, including a new error stating that 62% of
Pakistani Muslims favored the death penalty for apostasy. (For a
summary of my attempts to get various sources to correct their
numbers, see Appendix III in my detailed
article).
Some
sources reported Pew's (2013) apostasy numbers correctly. I haven't
done a thorough search, but here is a brief, casual, non-scientific
sample of people who got the apostasy numbers right: Eugene
Volokh (May 2,
2013); Andrew
Bostom (May 4,
2013); Shadi
Hamid (2014); and
Nicholas Kristof
(October 8, 2014).
Many
people from multiple sides of the debate over Maher's comments made
or relayed the 64% error, and many cited Fisher's (May 1, 2013)
Washington Post article as though it were a valid presentation of the
Pew (April 30, 2013) results [see Appendix IV in my detailed
article]. Many writers went further, relying on Fisher's
article in attempting to correct Maher's “90%” claim [see
Appendix IV in my detailed
article]. Here is a typical attempt, in this case by Dean
Obeidallah at CNN
Opinion (October 7, 2014):
“Maher
then cited a Pew Research poll that he claimed found that 90% of
Egyptians supported the death penalty for those who left Islam. I'm
not sure where Maher got his numbers, but a 2013
Pew poll actually found only 64% of Egyptians
supported this -- still alarmingly high, but not 90%...”
He mentions the Pew (2013) study but
links to the May 1, 2013 Washington Post article. Obeidallah's
article remains uncorrected (as of February 8, 2015), though he
apparently ignored a correspondent's attempt
to correct
him on twitter on October 9th and 17th, 2014.
Aslan Spreads the Error, Adds
More Errors
In the debate in the weeks following
Maher's comments, Reza Aslan appeared often in the popular media. In
an interview on “All In with Chris Hayes”
(October 13, 2014), Aslan apparently accepted the same false
assumption used in the original Fisher (May 1, 2013) article, as
shown in the exchange below on MSNBC (The relevant part of the
video clip
begins at about 2:50):
Chris Hayes: I
want to cite this poll that Bill Maher and Sam Harris, who is an
atheist author who was on Bill
Maher, who sort of have, have built a lot of this around. This is a
Pew Research poll. I think it was conducted in 2013 of different
views. This is views of Egyptian Muslims: 74% of Egyptian Muslims say
sharia should be official law—that is, of course, sort of
Qur'anically-derived religious law—and 86% of those say that there
should be a death penalty for converts, for people who leave Islam.
Now, that's about 60% of folks when you multiply those two—64%
that—when you multiply those two together. Now, that's a troubling
polling result, I think both you and I would agree, right?
Reza Aslan: The second number is a troubling poll result. The first
one, you have to understand that those very same, that very same poll
showed that of that 70-something percent, there was a massive
diversity of views of what they even meant by sharia. We're talking
about marriage and divorce laws, and inheritance laws, as well as
penal laws. But you're right. 64% wanting the death penalty for, for
converts out of Islam is incredibly frightening, until you read the
rest of the poll wherein 75% of Egyptians also wanted religious
freedom. If that sounds like a contradiction, it is, because religion
and religious-lived experience is full of contradictions. So, 64%
wanting the death penalty, that's scary. But, of course, in
neighboring Tunisia, it's about 12%. In, let's say Lebanon, it's 1 in
6. In Turkey, it's 5%.”
Hayes' multiplying
of the two percentages to get 64% is consistent with Fisher's
extrapolation; Pew didn't do that in their report. Aslan strongly
implies, to the naïve viewer, that he's read from the same Pew
(April 30, 2013) report, particularly when he says “that very same
poll showed that...” and “until you read the rest of the poll,
wherein...” In addition to Aslan's 64% error for Egypt, page 219 of
the Complete Report shows that his 12% for Tunisia and 5% for Turkey
are incorrect; Pew's figures are 18% and 8%, respectively. His errors
for Tunisia and Turkey are not large. What's more significant about
them—together with his 64% error which is quite large—is that
they suggest that he is unaware of p. 219 of the Complete Report (or
Topline Questionnaire). (I deal with his claim of “75%” support
for “religious freedom” in the next section, below)
Aslan's
approximation for Lebanon, phrased as “one in six,” happens to be
consistent with the 17% on p. 219 of the Complete Report, though
“one-in-six” is not uniquely linked to 17%. In a later
interview with Hartmann, discussed below, Aslan describes the figure
for Lebanon incorrectly as “10 or 9%,” which supports the idea
that he hadn't read p. 219.
Aslan
also spread the 64% error
via Twitter: “64% of Egyptians favor death for apostasy. 75% of
Egyptians favor full religious freedoms. That contradiction sums up
how religion is LIVED.” (October 13, 2014). When the author of Uncertainty Blog challenged Aslan's 64% figure, Aslan tried
to correct him, replying “@uncertaintyblog nope. 64%,” and
adding a link to the original Fisher (May 1, 2013) Washington Post
article. Aslan had also spread the error via AslanMedia
(Facebook, October 11, 2014), citing another Washington Post
article
that, at that time, contained an
erroneous presentation of Pew's (2013) apostasy and adultery numbers.
Aslan revisited the apostasy numbers
in an interview with host Thom Hartmann (October 20, 2014) on the
program “Conversations With Great Minds,” shown on Russia
Today (RT). The relevant section in Part 1, below, starts at about
3:00 into the linked
video [my brackets]:
Hartmann: “When
people like Sam Harris [and Bill Maher], for example, attack Islam,
they often point to last year's Pew study of the Islamic world. From
the Western point of view, that study showed some pretty shocking
stuff, like how 86% of Egyptians, and 76% of Pakistanis, support the
death penalty for [struggles with the word] apostasy—am I, I always
mangle that word but—”
Aslan: “For
apostasy, yeah.”
Hartmann:
“Apostasy. Thank you. How should we interpret this study and others
like it?”
Aslan: “Well,
first of all, those numbers are incorrect. It's actually 64% of
Egyptians who support the death penalty for apostasy, which is
outrageously high. But it's also not very instructive, either about
Egypt or about the larger Muslim world. For instance, in neighboring
Tunisia, the number is like 11%. In Lebanon, it's about 10 or 9%, I
believe. In Turkey I th— it's less than 5%. So what some Egyptians
believe is not instructive of the larger Muslim world. But it's even
more complicated than that, because the exact same poll that showed
that 64% of Egyptians favored the death penalty for apostasy from
Islam, also indicated that 75% of Egyptians want full religious
freedoms for all Egyptians in the country. And if that sounds like a
contradiction, that's because it is a contradiction.”
Hartmann evidently didn't have the
appropriate data prepared, and did not question Aslan about his
numbers. Aslan conveys firm confidence about the numbers,
matter-of-factly "correcting" Hartmann with the 64% figure,
and talking about the complication of the religious freedom result
that appears to contradict the apostasy result. Again, he gives the
impression, to the naïve viewer, of someone who has read the Pew
survey. Note the downward migration of Aslan's numbers for Tunisia
and Lebanon, and the change in phrasing for Turkey, since his
interview with Chris Hayes. I've summarized in Table 4 the relevant
Pew (April 30, 2013) and Washington Post (May 1, 2013) numbers for
comparison with the various numbers Aslan mentioned in the two
interviews.
Do 75% of Egyptian Muslims Support Religious Freedom?
In his Washington Post (May 1, 2013)
article,
Fisher wrote:
“...majorities
of Muslims in the countries surveyed, sometimes vast majorities, said
they support religious freedom. That includes, for example, more than
75 percent of Egyptians and more than 95 percent of Pakistanis. It
might seem like a glaring contradiction. And it is a
contradiction...”
Like the 64% figure for the apostasy
question, the figure of 75% (or the phrase “more than 75%”)
support among Egyptian Muslims overall for religious freedom is not
mentioned in the Pew (2013) report. Note that Aslan's talking points in the Hayes and Hartmann interviews about the 64% apostasy figure
and the 75% figure for religious freedom that “sounds like a
contradiction...is a contradiction...” seem to come from
Fisher's article.
For its measure of Muslims' support for
the religious freedom of non-Muslims, Pew uses responses from two
questions, Q10 and Q11, where the latter is a follow-up to
the former. Here are the questions:
Q10: “And in our country, how free are people from religions different than yours to practice their religion? Are they very free to practice their religion, somewhat free, not too free, or not at all free to practice their religion?”
Q11: “...And is this a good thing or a bad thing?”
If a respondent answered "very
free" to Q10, and said that that was "a good thing" in
response to Q11, Pew deemed that pair of responses to indicate
support for the religious freedom of non-Muslims. On pp. 63 and 172
(Complete Report), Pew shows data for Muslims who said, in response
to Q10, that non-Muslims were "very free" to practice their
(non-Muslim) faith in their country (e.g., Egypt). That subset is 31%
of Egyptian Muslims overall, as Pew indicates on pages 62, 63, and
172 of the Complete Report. Of that 31% of Egyptian Muslims, 77% said
that non-Muslims being very free to practice their faith was a "good
thing" (p. 63). 77% of the 31% subset is 24% of Egyptian Muslims
overall. The table for Q11 on p. 173 shows that 24% of Egyptian
Muslims overall said non-Muslims were very free and that that was a
good thing. (I summarize those results for Egypt in cross-tabulated
format in Table 5, below). In other words, applying Pew's own measure
of Muslims' support for the religious freedom of non-Muslims, we find
that only 24% of Egyptian Muslims overall support it. Fisher appears
to have taken the 77% of the subset as "more than 75
percent" of Egyptian Muslims overall. His "95
percent" claim for Pakistan also involves the same kind of
error. Aslan reported the same error as did Fisher for Egypt,
possibly due to having misread or not having read the original
report, or due to having relied on Fisher's article.
Summary
According to Pew (April 30, 2013), 88% of Egyptian Muslims support
the death penalty for people who leave Islam (p. 219, Complete
Report). That happens to be close to what Maher claimed. His critics
who claimed that the Pew figure in question was 64% were in many cases
relying on an erroneous secondary source from the popular media
instead of reading the original Pew source with due diligence. Those
who claimed that 75% (or more) of Egyptian Muslims supported
religious freedom seem to have not read (or to have misread) the Pew
(2013) report, which indicates that 24% of Egyptian Muslims overall
supported “religious freedom” for non-Muslims (p. 173, Complete
Report). This article highlights the perils of relying too heavily on secondary
sources, and the need for due diligence in evaluating claims.
*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
I know this is a really old article, but I just came across the tables in this Wikipedia article, and they seem to also be incorrect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy_in_Islam#Apostasy_in_the_recent_past
ReplyDeleteJust thought I would note that. I'm not 100% sure, and also not very familiar with editing Wikipedia, so just wanted to make a note here. I'll also see if I can point that out there.
Thank you. Wikipedia had that error at least since January 2015, as I noted in my longer piece which documents many of the secondary sources who misreported or made erroneous assumptions and extrapolations about Pew's apostasy data shown in their 2013 report.
Deletehttp://empethop.blogspot.ca/2015/02/a-fact-check-of-bill-maher-and-his.html
Their error indicates that they--like so many others--did not read, or did not read carefully, the original full report from Pew (2013), otherwise they would have seen p. 219.
If you do the correction, that would be great. One problem though: If you correct something on Wikipedia, someone else can come in and "uncorrect" it later.